We
are where we are. Few really want a city mayor, still less want a
Police & Crime Commissioner (I love that title.... which gets
commissioned first?). But in 48 hours will have one of each, so we
might as well limit the damage by voting to minimise the damage.
Or
even to really change the face of Bristol for the better.
First
choice for mayor – Daniella Radice, of course. Uniquely,
she offers a clear manifesto, strong commitments to neighbourhood
democracy, to equality, and to a green city, plus an honest
commitment to reduce cuts. Not forgetting my favourite... a real
interchange at Temple Meads.
It's not a wasted vote, either; if the
unlikely doesn't happen (though sometimes it does), there's always
the second preference vote.
Mine
goes to George Ferguson. Some doubts
– there's little commitment to equalities, a suspect
over-reliance on market forces, and promises of neighbourhood
democracy are very vague. But those are over-ridden by a freedom
from party dependency, by a broad commitment to green issues, by an
impressive track record – and by being less bad than the rest!
Marvin Rees might have got that second vote
but for being so deeply bound into Labour Party structures and
expectations to the exclusion of all and everyone else. Geoff Gollop was never in the running for me
because of the company he keeps, and ex-Doctor JonRogers.... well, even apart from his
loyalty to the party that lets this government claim a mandate to do
what it does, who wants a mayor who treats the residents as gullible
idiots, as so much of his publicity
does?
For
PCC, Pete Levy gets my first vote. His
comprehensive manifesto shows he's thought it through, and his
priorities and values look both right and realistic. Pity about the
LibDem party label.
The
others seem much of a muchness, all offering similar platitudes that
will offend no-one. So Sue Mountstevens gets the second vote,
simply because she's independent of party ties.
No comments:
Post a Comment