data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9af1/e9af10ce2bac51c65401e8ff47119bafd152a6d4" alt=""
Just as when clearing litter from paths, some passers-by ignore you completely; some thank you effusively; and others seem a bit perplexed that anyone could be doing such a thing without payment - though they too are appreciative.
Since it's unrealistic - impossible, even - to expect 'them', i.e. the council, to clear all the paths, it's not going to get done without a bit of local effort. Really, this work should be recognised in some way. But it's the kind of effort - like so many bits of unpaid voluntary work - that doesn't lend itself to the traditional employer/employee system, or to negotiated pay-per-job. So no money changes hands. The council plays a key part by distributing the grit in the first place (if you're lucky), or, for organised litter-picks, by providing protective gear and a collection service.
I wonder whether LETS - a Local Exchange and Trading System - has some role to play here, with the council (or conceivably a Neighbourhood Partnership) as one of the parties to a 'trade'. Possibly it could be with the individual volunteer, but more likely with a group such as a local club or society. Payment might be in a local currency, or in units of time, or in direct provision of services.
It's the sort of thing that could thrive in a well developed local economy, as skills and resources are shared more freely - and all the more so if there are harsh cutbacks that the party leaders are promising.
No comments:
Post a Comment