Tessa
Coombes, until recently the Director of Marketing, Membership and
Policy at Business West, has started her own blog, subtitled "policy
& politics blog with a focus on place".
She
kicks off with a nicely balanced piece "The South Bristol Link – A Road to Nowhere?",
about a project that, on behalf of her employers, she used to
champion.
In fact the name 'South Bristol Link' is attributable to
Tessa, who advised in an internal 2006 briefing (now sadly removed
from the Business West website) about what was then called the South
Bristol Ring Road:
"Think
about a new name for the road – it has a serious image problem!
South Bristol Link Road, Bedminster Bypass – anything to get away
from the idea of a ring road – “ring roads take people through
places, not to them”.
The
advice was heeded; even the word 'road' was removed from the project.
On the ground, though, the road signs weren't changed. Now, the
new road is even named in the North Somerset / Bristol joint working
agreement as the 'SOUTH BRISTOL BUS LINK', although well under 1% of
its users will be using buses or more sustainable transport.
On
its present course, the Ring Road follows a circuitous line by way of
the Parson Street gyratory and Winterstoke Road before it releases
its load onto the A370, north towards the Portway or southwest into
Somerset. At its eastern end, the options are east on the A4 to Bath or continuing round the Avon Ring Road, or north to the St Philips Causeway for the M32 and the M4.
If the SBL is built, ring road traffic might get through
South Bristol a few seconds quicker, and there'll be more of it. But
it will still be a Ring Road.
........
The
same Business West briefing acknowledged the lack of evidence for a
new road doing anything to improve business development in South
Bristol:
"The
argument for the ring road suggests it will have a beneficial impact
in access to existing employment sites (and may even open up new). If
this is the case then these need to be clearly identified. If Cater
Road and Hawkfield Business Parks will benefit, where is the
evidence? Need facts and figures to support the economic development
arguments particularly as more recent evidence on new road provision
would not support this case.”
7
years later, and free to express a view outside Business West, Tessa
still has doubts on this score:
“Only
time will tell whether or not such a road will create jobs and
encourage business to locate in the area, but all my instincts tell
me that providing improved road access to South Bristol is only a
very minor part of the problem. Businesses will still not locate
there if the office/business space is not attractive, the right
skills are not available locally and the local environment doesn’t
provide what their staff need. “
Surely,
the business lobby should be making that case – the new road is an
expensive, damaging, irrelevancy.
7 comments:
Jumping ship eh?
Veeery interesting.
Nice piece on my first blog post. Watch out for more!
Thanks, Tessa. You're on my blog list!
Its strange how no one seems able to tell things as they are when they have power.
Its only when they have no power, that they feel they can give genuine opinions based on actual facts.
Its destroying the country but no one seems to be able to explain why it happens.
harry
Very well said Harry.
It would be interesting to hear the insider's view on that.
To me as an ordinary member of the public, an outsider, excluded from any power at all, it looks like we are suffering under a managerial class that essentially operate like the Mafia, with a code of omerta.
I think it's universal, in any professional or 'group' setting – it's a brave individual that doesn't trot out the official line while being paid to do it.
I remember once being part of a local radio panel just after a horrendous fire had been dealt with in the middle of a big chemical works on Teesside. Before we were on air, all the experts, including the fire services, were breathing a communal sigh of relief that luck (and the wind direction) were on our side, else they couldn't possibly have coped and the outcome would have been too awful to contemplate. Once the broadcast started, they were, to a man, quietly reassuring and professional, giving the public the impression that there's absolutely nothing to worry about, we're all safe in their hands.
It wasn't so much what they said, but the way they could switch roles so easily, that shook me
Pete, the example you give just seems like professionalism and responsible leadership to me, and quite innocent in the context you give, so long as there's no cover up of malpractice going on. Let's face it, nothing's ever perfect, and no-one can foresee, let alone provide for all potential eventualities. Unpreventable accidents will always occur.
In contrast, what many of us see going on in our contemporary polity is barely disguised criminal racketeering, coupled with negligence and deliberate, calculating cover-up, by those in positions of power and responsibility, who are extorting huge "remuneration" from the public purse for the privilege.
The recent examples are too numerous to mention. It has become commonplace, accepted even, that our rulers are corrupt. No wonder people are turning away in droves from "voting", or voting for demagoguery like ukip.
I don't see any way to reform the system, it will only end when it collapses putrefying under its own dead weight and complexity.
Trouble is, we'll all be caught underneath it when it goes!
Post a Comment